DiscoverYou, me & the UPCCase by case | Court of Appeal Upholds First Instance Decision Ruling on Inadmissible Broadening
Case by case | Court of Appeal Upholds First Instance Decision Ruling on Inadmissible Broadening

Case by case | Court of Appeal Upholds First Instance Decision Ruling on Inadmissible Broadening

Update: 2025-12-19
Share

Description

On 5 November 2025, the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal by Seoul Viosys Co Ltd (Viosys) against the decision of the Düsseldorf Local Division (LD) revoking its EP 3 223 320 patent for inadmissible broadening. Nischay Mall dives into the details in this episode. Check it out now!

The appeal Mischay refers to in this episode can be read about here.

If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Case by case | Court of Appeal Upholds First Instance Decision Ruling on Inadmissible Broadening

Case by case | Court of Appeal Upholds First Instance Decision Ruling on Inadmissible Broadening

Bristows LLP